Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUMIT VILAS AWATADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The order rejecting approval of the petitioner’s appointment is set aside and the Education Officer is directed to grant approval.

Summary

The petitioner, Sumit Vilas Awatade, was appointed as a junior clerk in a grant‑in‑aid private school on 10 July 2024. The Education Officer rejected the approval of this appointment on the ground that surplus non‑teaching staff existed, relying on a communication dated 28 May 2025 and the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. The petitioner contended that his appointment preceded the communication, that no surplus junior clerk existed at the time, and that a later Government Resolution dated 11 August 2026 superseded the earlier directive. The Court held that the Education Officer’s rejection was unsustainable, quashed the impugned order, and directed the officer to approve the appointment, issue a Shalarth ID, and release arrears. Consequently, the petition was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Education Officer could lawfully reject the appointment of the petitioner on the ground of surplus non‑teaching staff under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 and the Regulation Act, 1977.
  • Whether the communication dated 28 May 2025 and the subsequent Government Resolution dated 11 August 2026 affect the validity of the appointment made on 10 July 2024.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • appointment
  • surplus staff
  • grant‑in‑aid school
  • education officer
  • Maharashtra service rules
  • writ petition
  • quashing order

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:8849-DB

                                                                          19-WP-11951-2025.doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 11951 OF 2025


               Sumit Vilas Awatade                                        ...Petitioner
                         Versus
               The State Of Maharashtra Thr. The Secretary And            ...Respondents
               Others

                                               ——————
               Mr. Sandeep Koregave a/w Ms. Supriya Koregave, for the Petitioner.
               Mr. A.P.Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent-State.
               Ms. Ashok Misal (through VC), for the Respondent No. 4.
                                               ——————
                                                 Coram :     SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
                                                             NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
                                                 Date      : SEPTEMBER 11, 2026
               P. C. :

               1.        By the present Petition, the Petitioner impugns the order dated

               25th June, 2025 passed by the Education Officer rejecting the proposal

               for approval to the Petitioner’s appointment on aided post of junior

               clerk with effect from 10th July, 2024 in Respondent No. 7-school.

               2.        The Petitioner was appointed in the Respondent No. 7 school

               after the post of junior clerk became vacant, upon retirement of one Mr.

               Ramesh Appa Chikhale on 31st May, 2019. On 13th June, 2024,

               Respondent No. 6 applied to the Respondent No. 5-Education Officer

               seeking permission to initiate the recruitment process to fill the said



               Arya Chavan                        1 of 4
                                                       19-WP-11951-2025.doc


post by issuing advertisement, to which there was no response.

Subsequently, the management issued an advertisement, to which the

Petitioner applied and was selected by appointment order dated 10 th

July, 2024. On 6th August, 2024, a proposal was sent to the Education

Officer seeking approval to the appointment of the Petitioner on the

aided post of junior clerk in Respondent No. 7-school, which was

rejected by the impugned order.

3.      Learned counsel for the Petitioner would point out that the

grounds for rejection was availability of surplus non-teaching staff, and

in view of the communication dated 28th May, 2025. He would further

submit that the Education Officer failed to notice that the Petitioner's

appointment was made on 10th July, 2024 i.e. prior to the issuance of

communication dated 28th May, 2025, and in any event, there was no

surplus junior clerk available, as per the Education Officer’s own

minutes regarding the availability of surplus staff.

4.      Per contra, learned AGP would support the impugned order and

would submit that since the post of junior clerk is of direct service, the

appointment is required to be done after completing Sanch Manyata

surplus rule as per the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools

(Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981,and its regulations.

5.      The only ground on which the approval was rejected is that the

surplus non-teaching staff was available, and the communication dated


Arya Chavan                       2 of 4
                                                        19-WP-11951-2025.doc


28th May, 2025, issued by the Director of Education prohibits approval to

be granted unless surplus staff is absorbed. Insofar as the

communication dated 28th May, 2025 is concerned, the Petitioner has

been appointed on 10th July, 2024, and after seeking permission from

the Respondent-Education Officer on 13th June, 2024, to fill the post by

issuing advertisement. It is only due to inaction on part of Respondent-

Education Officer that the management, in compliance of Section 5 of

the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service)

Regulation Act, 1977, proceeded to fill the vacant post of junior clerk. In

any event, the communication dated 28th May, 2025 already stands

superseded by Government Resolution dated 11th August, 2026. The

rejection on the ground of non-absorption of surplus junior clerk will

also not survive in view of the Education Officer’s own minutes dated

16th July, 2025 annexed at page 61 of the Petition. Perusal of the said

minutes would indicate that no surplus junior clerk was available at the

time of the Petitioner's appointment.

6.      In light of the above, the impugned order is clearly unsustainable

and is hereby quashed and set aside.

7.      The Education Officer is directed to grant approval to the

appointment of the Petitioner on the post of junior clerk with effect

from 10th July, 2024 within a period of three weeks from today.

8.      After approval has been granted, Respondent No. 3 to include the


Arya Chavan                       3 of 4
                                                      19-WP-11951-2025.doc


name of the Petitioner in Shalarth Pranali and issue Shalarth ID within a

period of two weeks thereafter. The Petitioner’s arrears of grant-in-aid

salary to be released within a period of three weeks thereafter.

9.      The Petition is allowed in the above terms.

10.     Applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand

disposed of.




 [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]                     [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]




Arya Chavan                       4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.