Bombay High Court
ARUN ALIAS ANIRUDHA EKNATH LOKHANDE AND OTHERSversusSHOBHABAI NAGNATH VAIJWADE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order. The respondent informed the court that the order had already been implemented. The court, relying on the respondent's statement, considered the petition to have become infructuous. Consequently, the court found no further relief could be granted. The petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated beyond the procedural disposal.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition becomes infructuous when the impugned order has already been implemented?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- implementation
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:442
917-WP-11959-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
917 WRIT PETITION NO. 11959 OF 2021
Arun Alias Anirudha Eknath Lokhande And Others
VERSUS
Shobhabai Nagnath Vaijwade And Others
…..
Mr. C. D. Biradar h/f Mr. U. P. Giri, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. Gujrathi Pushpak U., Advocate for Respondent No.2
…..
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 08.01.2026
PER COURT :
1. This Court, on 17.03.2025, observed that pursuant to the
statement made by the learned Counsel for Respondent, the order
which is being assailed in the present petition is already implemented,
and therefore, the petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of relying on the statement of the Respondent, I am
inclined to dispose of the petition.
3. Hence, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]
Sameer/January-2026
1
Checking your session…