Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAMOD RAMDAS KOTHAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court disposed of all the writ petitions as withdrawn because the petitioners elected to pursue an alternative remedy.

Summary

A series of writ petitions (WP/1182/2025 to WP/1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was available and that they intended to pursue that route instead of the writ proceedings. The respondents, including the State and its officers, were represented by several counsel, notably V. B. Patil and A. B. Girase. The Court examined whether the petitions should continue in light of the petitioners' election to use the alternative remedy. Finding that the petitioners voluntarily withdrew the writ applications, the Court disposed of all the petitions as withdrawn, granting them liberty as prayed. The order effectively closed the writ proceedings without addressing the substantive merits.

Issues considered

  • The appropriateness of continuing writ petitions when the petitioners have an alternative statutory remedy available
  • The effect of a petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of a writ petition on the Court's jurisdiction

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • alternative remedy
  • High Court of Bombay
  • jurisdiction
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12360-DB




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              907 WRIT PETITION NO. 1182 OF 2025
                                       Deepak Jaywant Bagad
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others


                              908 WRIT PETITION NO. 1185 OF 2025

                                     Subhash Beniram Kothawade
                                               VERSUS
                                 The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                              909 WRIT PETITION NO. 1187 OF 2025
                                  Pandharinath Beniram Kothawade
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                              910 WRIT PETITION NO. 1189 OF 2025
                                     Dinesh Devidas Pendharkar
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                              911 WRIT PETITION NO. 1190 OF 2025
                                     Satish Uddhav Kothawade
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                          912 WRIT PETITION NO. 1199 OF 2025
                                  Anil Pandurang Kothawade
                                           VERSUS
                  The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

                              913 WRIT PETITION NO. 1200 OF 2025
                                         Pravin Kantilal Shimpi
                                               VERSUS
                            The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others

                              914 WRIT PETITION NO. 1201 OF 2025
                                       Pravin Bhila Kothawade
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others



           PB-7 to 22.odt                                                       1 of 3
                 915 WRIT PETITION NO. 1202 OF 2025
                        Sachin Shankar Dhamane
                                 VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others

               916 WRIT PETITION NO. 1203 OF 2025
                        Haridas Ramdas Shirsat
                                VERSUS
       The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others

              917 WRIT PETITION NO. 1204 OF 2025
                      Sagar Prabhakar Kothawade
                               VERSUS
       The State Of Mahrashtra Through The Secretary And Others

                 918 WRIT PETITION NO. 1205 OF 2025
                        Sayyed Nasir Sayyed Zafar
                                 VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                 919 WRIT PETITION NO. 1206 OF 2025
                          Dilip Babulal Bhadane
                                 VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                 920 WRIT PETITION NO. 1207 OF 2025
                       Hemant Somnath Kothawade
                                 VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                 921 WRIT PETITION NO. 1208 OF 2025
                       Pramod Ramdas Kothawade
                                 VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                 922 WRIT PETITION NO. 1259 OF 2025
                         Vijay Shankar Chaudhari
                                 VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others

Mr. A. T. Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioners in all Writ Petitions
Mr. V. B. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 5 in all Writ Petitions
Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for respondent-State in WP/1189/2025 and
WP/1205/2025.



PB-7 to 22.odt                                                         2 of 3
Ms. N. B. Kamble, Mr. A. M. Phule, Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Mr. S. K. Tambe,
Mr. S. B. Narwade, Mr. V. M. Kagne, Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for respondent-
State in respective matter

                                 CORAM : Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi &
                                         Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.
                                 DATE      : 18th March, 2026

PER COURT :-


1.            Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.



2.            Learned Advocate for petitioners, upon oral instructions,

submits that the alternative remedy is available. Petitioners would take

up the alternative remedy, and therefore, seeks withdrawal of the

petitions.



3.            In view of the aforesaid statement, all Writ Petitions stands

disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.




(Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.)                (Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.)

B. S. Joshi




PB-7 to 22.odt                                                        3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.