Bombay High Court
SHAIKH MAZHAR HAJI SHAIKH ISMAILversusMADHAVRAO BAPURAO RANDIVE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The court held that the writ petition is infructuous because of the lapse of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Shaikh Mazhar Haji Shaikh Ismail, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court considered whether the petition could still be entertained despite the alleged delay. Relying on the submission that the cause of action was time‑barred, the bench held that the petition could not be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the passage of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation period
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:31134
4 WP1216.2014
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
4 WRIT PETITION NO. 1216 OF 2014
SHAIKH MAZHAR HAJI SHAIKH ISMAIL
VERSUS
MADHAVRAO BAPURAO RANDIVE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Anil M. Gaikwad
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 27.07.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. Anil M. Gaikwad, learned counsel for the
Petitioner submits that by passage of time the Petition is
rendered infructuous.
2. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…