Bombay High Court
OMPRAKASHJI RATANLALJI MALPANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Summary
Omprakashji Ratanlalji Malpani filed a writ petition (No. 12223 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court examined whether the delay rendered the petition non‑maintainable. Relying on the principle that a petition must be timely to be effective, the court held that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable despite the passage of time.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- delay
- maintainability
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:32334
14 WP12223.2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
14 WRIT PETITION NO. 12223 OF 2015
OMPRAKASHJI RATANLALJI MALPANI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. B. N. Patil
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. D. Patil
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 31.07.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. B. N. Patil, learned counsel for the Petitioner
submits that by passage of time the Petition is rendered
infructuous.
2. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…