Bombay High Court
REKHA DNYANESHWAR KUNTEversusM/S. CAMBATA AVIATION PVT. LTD. AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
A writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution where the petitioner fails to appear and takes no steps to advance the petition.
Summary
Rekha Dnyaneshwar Kunte filed a writ petition on 23 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the judges held that the petition could not be kept pending. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and makes no effort to advance the petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- court procedure
Judgment
DTG 250-WP-1234-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1234 OF 2018
Rekha Dnyaneshwar Kunte …Petitioner
V/s.
M/S. Cambata Aviation Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th April 2026
P.C. :
1) None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
23rd February 2018, the Petitioner and/or her Advocate has not taken any
steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…