Bombay High Court
MANISHA MUKUND NAIK AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as there was no remaining issue after the decree in the civil suit.
Summary
The petitioners, Manisha Mukund Naik and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 January 2020 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad in RCS No. 23 of 2018. They contended that the civil suit (RCS No. 23 of 2018) had already been decreed, rendering the order moot. The High Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication after the decree. Finding that the decree had indeed been passed and no further relief could be granted, the Court held that there was nothing left to consider. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without any further order.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, remains for the High Court to grant after the decree in RCS No. 23 of 2018?
- Is the writ petition maintainable when the underlying civil suit has been fully decreed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil decree
- petition dismissed
- jurisdiction
- no relief
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:1214
wp12360-21.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12360 OF 2021
Manisha Mukund Naik and Others PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Ms. Harsha R. Lomte h/f Mr.V. D. Salunke, Advocate for
Petitioners
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]
DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026
ORDER :
1. Order dated 18.01.2020 passed by Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Osmanabad below Exhibit-45 in RCS No. 23 of 2018 is
challenged in the present Writ Petition.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that RCS No.
23 of 2018 is decreed.
3. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in
the matter. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
drp/wp12360-21.doc
Checking your session…