Bombay High Court
MANGALABAI BHARAT WADJEversusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSINOR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed.
Summary
Mangalabai Bharat Wadje filed a writ petition (No.12465 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Additional Commissioner and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Anurag V. Sakolkar, h/f Mr. V. G. Sakolkar. The respondent State was represented by Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP. The petitioner argued that the relief sought was still viable, but the learned counsel submitted that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined whether the petition could continue to be entertained despite the lapse of time. Finding that the petition had become infructuous, the Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable or has become infructuous due to the passage of time?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation
- jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
wp12465-21.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12465 OF 2021
Mangalabai Bharat Wadje PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Additional Commissioner and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Anurag V. Sakolkar h/f Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for
Petitioner
Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]
DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that by the
passage of time, the Petition has become infructuous.
2. Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
drp/wp12465-21.doc
Checking your session…