Bombay High Court
ZAINUL ABDIN ABDUL RASHID SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court granted liberty to the Respondent to release the detainee and disposed of the petition as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition alleging that the detainee was being held in police custody without legal authority. The Respondent, the State, through the Acting Chief Police Prosecutor, informed the Court that the detainee would be released on the same day and sought liberty to take appropriate action. The Court granted the liberty sought by the Respondent to release the detainee. Following this, the petitioner's counsel chose not to pursue the petition further. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the detainee's continued custody in the police station was authorized by law.
Subjects
- detention
- police custody
- writ petition
- liberty
- procedural law
Judgment
1/2 902-WP-1247-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1247 OF 2026
Zainul Abidin S/o Abdul Rashid Shaikh .... Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents
…....
• Mr. R. A. Shaikh a/w Hasan Sayed, Mariyah Khatkhatey, Shubi
Syed and Naziya Bhaldar i/b. Darakhsha Begzad, Advocate for
Petitioner.
• Smt. M. M. Deshmukh, Acting Chief PP a/w Ms. Mahalakshmi
Ganapathy, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 10th APRIL, 2026
P.C. :
1. This Petition is filed with the grievance that the
detenue is kept in the police station without any authority of
law.
2. Heard Mr. R. A. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the
MANUSHREE
NESARIKAR Petitioner and Smt. M. M. Deshmukh, Acting Chief PP for the
Digitally signed
by MANUSHREE
NESARIKAR State.
Date: 2026.04.10
16:58:42 +0530
Nesarikar
2/2 902-WP-1247-26.odt
3. At the outset, learned PP, on instructions, states that the
detenue will be permitted to leave the police station today itself.
She seeks liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with
law.
4. The statement is recorded and accepted. The liberty, as
sought for by the learned APP, is granted.
5. In view of this statement, learned counsel for the
Petitioner does not press this Petition.
6. The Petition is disposed of as not pressed.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Checking your session…