Bombay High Court
MS DR HEGDEWAR NAGARI COOP PATSANSTHA MARYADIT AND ANOTHERversusKAMALKISHORE RADHESYAM PARIK
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the delay.
Summary
The petitioners, a cooperative society and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the delay had rendered the prayers in the petition ineffective. The court examined whether the petition could be entertained despite the delay. Concluding that the passage of time had made the petition infructuous, the court disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be entertained despite the lapse of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- delay
- infructuous
- high court
Judgment
(1) 1103-wp-12512-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 12512 OF 2024
MS DR HEGDEWAR NAGARI COOP PATSANSTHA MARYADIT
AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
KAMALKISHORE RADHESYAM PARIK
...
Mr. Vinayak Narayan Upadhye, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. R. B. Muley and Mr. S. A. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent
No.1.
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 28th JANUARY, 2026.
P.C.:-
1. Mr. Upadhye, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner
informs that due to efflux of time, prayers in writ petition does not
survive and it has rendered infructuous.
2. In that view of matter, Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)
JUDGE
Devendra/January-2026
Checking your session…