Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DILIP LAXMANRAO AHERversusPARWATI SAHAKARI GRUH NIRMAN SANSTHA LTD THRO CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was held to be infructuous and therefore dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Dilip Laxmanrao Aher, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Parwati Sahakari Gruh Nirman Sanstha Ltd. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any live dispute or relief to be granted. The Court examined the submission and found that indeed no cause of action remained. Consequently, the Court held that there was nothing left for consideration. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous, and any pending civil applications, if any, were also dismissed. The judgment was delivered by Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre on 9 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • civil applications
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9936
                                                   1                         42 WP 12561-2016.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 42 WRIT PETITION NO. 12561 OF 2016

                                DILIP LAXMANRAO AHER
                                        VERSUS
              PARWATI SAHAKARI GRUH NIRMAN SANSTHA LTD THRO CHAIRMAN
                                      AND OTHERS

                                                 …
             Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi – Advocate for Petitioner
             Ms. A.N. Tanpure h/f. Mr. R.V. Gore – Advocate for Respondent No.1
                                                 …

                                      CORAM            : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE             : 09.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has

             become infructuous and, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in

             the present petition.


             2.       In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.


             3.       Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.




                                                          [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                    JUDGE


             Pooja Kale/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.