Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RANU RANAversusCENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.1288 of 2012 in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and it was observed that the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the case due to the passage of time. The Court therefore dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, the accompanying Notice of Motion was also held not to survive and was disposed of. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                      36-WP-1288-12WITH NMW.DOC



 JYOTI                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 RAJESH
 MANE
Digitally signed
by JYOTI RAJESH
                                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
MANE
Date: 2026.02.03
17:41:51 +0530
                                        WRIT PETITION NO.1288 OF 2012
                                                   WITH
                                       NOTICE OF MOTION NO.379 OF 2016
                                                    IN
                                        WRIT PETITION NO.1288 OF 2012


                   Ranu Rana                                          ...Petitioner
                         Versus
                   Central Industrial Security
                   Force And Ors.                                     ...Respondents
                                                          _______
                   None for the Petitioner.
                   Mr. Anil D. Yadav, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 8.
                                                          _______

                                                 CORAM:         G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                AARTI SATHE, JJ.

                                                 DATE:          02 FEBRUARY 2026

                   P.C.

                   1.          None appears for the Petitioner. It appears that, due to passage of time,

                   the Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Petition.

                   2.          Dismissed for want of prosecution.

                   3.          Notice of Motion would not survive and stands disposed of.




                          (AARTI SATHE, J.)                           (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                                       Page 1 of 1
                   Mane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.