Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

YASHWANT BHAGWAN MUNDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court ordered that the word ‘Omerga’ be replaced by ‘Osmanabad’ in the operative part of the order dated 09.03.2026.

Summary

Yashwant Bhagwan Mundhe filed writ petition No. 12968 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a clerical error in the operative part of an order dated 09.03.2026. The petitioner sought a correction of the word "Omerga" to "Osmanabad" in the second line of the operative part. The Court examined the motion and found no substantive issue, only a typographical mistake. Accordingly, the Court directed that the erroneous word be replaced with the correct one. The motion for correction was disposed of, and the corrected order was to be uploaded.

Issues considered

  • Whether the word "Omerga" in the operative part of the order dated 09.03.2026 should be corrected to "Osmanabad"?

Subjects

  • clerical correction
  • writ petition
  • court order
  • operative part
  • correction of error

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:10233
                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of1order
                                                           of 1 dated //     speaking-WP.12968.2023



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                   94 WRIT PETITION NO. 12968 OF 2023

                                    YASHWANT BHAGWAN MUNDHE
                                               VERSUS
                  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR
                                            AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
                Mr. Sartaj H. Pathan h/f. Mr. Hanumant Pandurang Bondar, Advocate
                for the Petitioner.
                Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for Respondent-State.
                Mr. Mukul S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                                                  ...
                                               CORAM :         SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                               DATE       :    15th APRIL 2026
                P.C.:-

                1.          Motion is made for speaking to minutes in respect of order

                dated 09.03.2026.

                2.          It is submitted that in order dated 09.03.2026, in (i) point of

                operative part, second line, the word “Omerga” is wrongly mentioned

                instead of “Osmanabad”.

                3.          In view of above submissions, in (i) point of operative part,

                second line, the word “Omerga” be replaced by “Osmanabad”.

                4.          Necessary corrections be carried out and corrected order be

                uploaded accordingly.

                5.          Motion is disposed of.

                                                           (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)



      Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.