Bombay High Court

PRIYADARSHANI MAHILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER BEEDversusKADUBAI BABASAHEB TANDALE AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the respondents had cleared all dues, leaving no matter for consideration.

Summary

Priyadarshini Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd, through its branch manager, filed a writ petition against Kadubai Babasaheb Tandele and others alleging outstanding dues. The respondents contended that all dues had been fully cleared. The court examined the claim and found that the respondents had indeed settled all amounts owed. Consequently, the court held that there was no substantive matter left for adjudication. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous, and the case was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition remains maintainable when the respondents have fully cleared all dues

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
bank
loan recovery
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:597
                                                  1                         929 WP 12974-2017.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                929 WRIT PETITION NO. 12974 OF 2017

                   PRIYADARSHANI MAHILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD THROUGH ITS
                                  BRANCH MANAGER BEED
                                         VERSUS
                          KADUBAI BABASAHEB TANDALE AND OTHERS

                                                …
             Mr. Manoj U. Shelke – Advocate for Petitioner
                                                …

                                      CORAM           : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE            : 08.01.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents

             have already cleared all the dues and, therefore, nothing survives for

             consideration in the present petition.


             2.       In view thereof, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.



                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE


             Pooja Kale/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…