Bombay High Court
MADHURI PRITAM CHOUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Madhuri Pritam Choudhari filed Writ Petition No. 130 of 2019 on 8 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the Court held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to pursue the petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- court dismissal
- procedural default
- high court
Judgment
DTG 58-wp130.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 130 OF 2019
Madhuri Pritam Choudhari … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
8th January 2019, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps
to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…