Bombay High Court
MRS. SHUBHANGI UDAYRAJ TALASHIKARversusMRS. SUSHMA R. ADELKAR AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
- Bench
- MADHAV JAMDAR
Holding
A writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request, and the court may permit its withdrawal and dispose of the petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Sonali, filed a writ petition (No.1300 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court against respondents Sushma R. Adelkar and an unnamed second respondent. The petition was filed in the civil appellate jurisdiction and was signed digitally by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Gulabrao Awasarmol together with Mr. Pawan S. Dabhade and Mr. Anand Awasarmol, moved before the court seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered whether a petitioner may unilaterally withdraw a pending writ petition. Finding no legal impediment, the court allowed the withdrawal and ordered the petition to be disposed of. Consequently, the writ petition was withdrawn and the matter was closed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition pending before the High Court may be withdrawn at the request of the petitioner.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court procedure
- petition disposal
Judgment
7-WP-1300-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1300 OF 2024
Digitally
signed by Shubhangi Udayraj Talashikar …Petitioner
SONALI
SONALI MILIND Versus
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.06.12
Sushma R. Adelkar & Anr. …Respondents
17:59:06
+0530
Mr. Gulabrao Awasarmol a/w. Mr. Pawan S. Dabhade i/b. Mr.
Anand Awasarmol, for the Petitioner.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 12th JUNE 2026
PC:-
1. Mr. Awasarmol, learned Counsel Appearing for the Petitioner
seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
and disposed of as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1
Sonali
Checking your session…