Bombay High Court
SITARAM LAXMAN AUTIversusSURESH GANPAT ABALE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is infructuous and is disposed.
Summary
Sitaram Laxman Auti filed a writ petition against Suresh Ganpat Abale. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the dispute underlying the petition had already been settled between the parties. Consequently, the petitioner argued that there was nothing left for the court to consider. The bench examined the submission and found that, with the matter settled, the petition no longer raised any live issue. Accordingly, the court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the parties have settled the dispute
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- settlement
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:584
1 905 WP 13085-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 WRIT PETITION NO. 13085 OF 2017
SITARAM LAXMAN AUTI
VERSUS
SURESH GANPAT ABALE
…
Mr. P.J. Sagalgile h/f. Mr. Sandeep D. Munde – Advocate for Petitioner
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 08.01.2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is
already settled and, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the
present petition.
2. In view thereof, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…