Bombay High Court

MUKHTAR ALI MOHAMMAD ALIversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER PARBHANI

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition was disposed of because the cause of action no longer survived in the main proceedings.

Summary

Mukhtar Ali Mohammad Ali filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State Bank of India, Parbhani branch. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Mr. Vijay R. Aatade, while the respondent was represented by Advocate Mr. Prakash B. Paithankar. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the underlying cause of action no longer existed in the main proceedings. The Court examined this submission and found that there was no longer any live dispute to adjudicate. Consequently, the Court held that there was nothing left to consider in the writ petition and ordered its disposal.

Subjects

writ petition
disposal
cause of action
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:15892
                                                1 of 1                      100-WP.13109.2017




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              100 WRIT PETITION NO. 13109 OF 2017

                                   MUKHTAR ALI MOHAMMAD ALI
                                               VERSUS
                      STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER
                                              PARBHANI
                                                   ...
                Mr. Vijay R. Aatade, Advocate for the Petitioner.
                Mr. Prakash B. Paithankar, Advocate for Respondent.
                                                   ...

                                        CORAM :          SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                        DATE     :       10th APRIL, 2026
                P.C.:-

                1.       Heard Mr. Aatade, learned Advocate for the Petitioner.


                2.       Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the cause no

                longer survives in the main proceedings to prosecute the matter.


                3.       In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition and

                the same stands disposed of.


                                                  (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)




      Tauseef

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…