Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABDUL RAJJAK ABDUL GANNI PARKARversusTHE SR. POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after April 24, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. The petition was therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

DTG                                                          161-Wp.1321.2019.doc



                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        WRIT PETITION NO. 1321 OF 2019

Abdul Rajjak Abdul Ganni Parkar                      … Petitioner
         V/s.
The Sr. Police Inspector & Ors.                      … Respondents
                   _______________________________________

None for Petitioner.

Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                _______________________________________

                            CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                    KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                            DATE  : 17th June 2026

P.C. :

1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

2)              Record indicates that, after 24th April 2019, neither the

Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

once.

2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

Petition.

3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )


                                                                                    1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.