Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DWARKANATH NAMDEV PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Dwarkanath Namdev Patil, filed a writ petition on 9 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No further action was taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, including failure to circulate it for hearing. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by Judges A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a filed writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                         sbw                                                     257-wp-1325-2018.doc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.1325 OF 2018

                    Dwarkanath Namdev Patil                                 … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                         … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioner.
                    Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE :     18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                    9th March, 2018, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps

                    to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                        1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:10
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.