Bombay High Court
MANIK TUKARAM DUDHANEversusKALAKRUTI CREATIONS THR PRO. USHA D HALDE
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- ARUN R PEDNEKER
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as it has been rendered infructuous.
Summary
Manik Tukaram Dudhane filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of Dusane and Kalakruti Creations. The petition was heard on 6 August 2026 before Justice Arun R. Pedneker. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was nothing left for adjudication, essentially that the relief sought could no longer be granted. The court accepted this submission and held that the petition was rendered infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition when a writ petition is found to be infructuous?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13287 OF 2025
Manik Tukaram Dudhane .. Petitioner
BHALCHANDRA
GOPAL
Vs.
DUSANE Kalakruti Creations .. Respondent
Digitally signed by
BHALCHANDRA
through Prop. Usha D. Halde
GOPAL DUSANE
Date: 2026.08.10
17:42:02 +0530
Mr. Amay Pawar h/f Mr. Pramod J. Pawar for Petitioner.
None for Respondent.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 6th August 2026
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the
present Writ Petition.
2 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having been rendered
infructuous.
[ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ]
1/1
25 WP 13287.25.doc Dusane
Checking your session…