Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NANDEEPAK DAYAL PATADEversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Nandeepak Dayal Patade, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after June 11, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered the lack of prosecution as a ground for dismissal. The judges, Kamal Khata and A.S. Gadkari, dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of non‑prosecution by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

DTG                                                           60-wp133.2019.doc



                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 133 OF 2019

Nandeepak Dayal Patade                                       … Petitioner
         V/s.
The Commissioner Of Police & Ors.                            … Respondents
                    _______________________________________

None for Petitioner.

Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                 _______________________________________

                            CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                    KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                            DATE  : 17th June 2026

P.C. :

1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

2)              Record indicates that, after 11th June 2019, neither the Petitioner

nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

Petition.

3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                   ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                  1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.