Bombay High Court
NANDEEPAK DAYAL PATADEversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Nandeepak Dayal Patade, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after June 11, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered the lack of prosecution as a ground for dismissal. The judges, Kamal Khata and A.S. Gadkari, dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of non‑prosecution by the petitioner
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
DTG 60-wp133.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 133 OF 2019
Nandeepak Dayal Patade … Petitioner
V/s.
The Commissioner Of Police & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 11th June 2019, neither the Petitioner
nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…