Bombay High Court
HAARIS MAMU SHAIKHversusSHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY IMRAN BABASAB PATAHAN AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Haaris Mamu Shaikh, filed a writ petition (No. 13349 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. The matter remained pending for several years without any prosecution by the petitioner. On 8 January 2026, the petitioner failed to appear in both the morning and afternoon sessions. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition in default for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when a petitioner fails to prosecute a pending writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- want of prosecution
- High Court
- civil procedure
Judgment
934-WP-13349-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
934 WRIT PETITION NO. 13349 OF 2019
Haaris Mamu Shaikh
VERSUS
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd Through Power Of Attorney Imran
Babasab Patahan And Others
…..
…..
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 08.01.2026
PER COURT :
1. In the morning session, when the matter was called out, none
appears for the Petitioner and, therefore, the matter was kept back. In
the afternoon session also, when the matter was called out, nobody
appears for the Petitioner.
2. This Petition is pending since 2019 and the same is not
prosecuted. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting
the matter. Hence, the Petition is dismissed in default for want of
prosecution.
[SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]
Sameer/January-2026
1
Checking your session…