Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HAARIS MAMU SHAIKHversusSHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY IMRAN BABASAB PATAHAN AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Haaris Mamu Shaikh, filed a writ petition (No. 13349 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. The matter remained pending for several years without any prosecution by the petitioner. On 8 January 2026, the petitioner failed to appear in both the morning and afternoon sessions. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition in default for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate remedy when a petitioner fails to prosecute a pending writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • default dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • High Court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                            934-WP-13349-2019.odt


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                      934 WRIT PETITION NO. 13349 OF 2019

                           Haaris Mamu Shaikh
                                 VERSUS
     Shriram City Union Finance Ltd Through Power Of Attorney Imran
                       Babasab Patahan And Others

                                      …..
                                      …..

                                 CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                 DATE       : 08.01.2026


PER COURT :

1.       In the morning session, when the matter was called out, none

appears for the Petitioner and, therefore, the matter was kept back. In

the afternoon session also, when the matter was called out, nobody

appears for the Petitioner.



2.      This Petition is pending since 2019 and the same is not

prosecuted. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting

the matter. Hence, the Petition is dismissed in default for want of

prosecution.




                                        [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]


Sameer/January-2026


                                        1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.