Bombay High Court

BHAKTI DOOR PARTS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ANITA SWAPNIL PILAJI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: S G CHAPALGAONKAR

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petitions, dismissing them with liberty to seek an alternate remedy.

Summary

The petitioners, Bhakti Door Parts and its proprietor Anita Swapnil Pilaji, filed two writ petitions (Nos. 1348 and 1349 of 2025) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through their counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petitions. The Court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed, with the Court noting that the petitioners retain the liberty to pursue any alternate remedy permissible by law. No substantive merits of the original claims were adjudicated.

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
civil procedure
high court
state action

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24298


                           IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                265 WRIT PETITION NO. 1349 OF 2025
                                              WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1348 OF 2025

                 BHAKTI DOOR PARTS THR ITS PROPRIETOR ANITA SWAPNIL PILAJI
                                      AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT
                                  COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

                                                  ......
                 Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Aniket S. Avhad h/f. Mr. Shrimant
                 Ravsaheb Kedar
                 AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale
                 Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 : Mr. U. L. Momale
                                                  ......

                                              CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                               DATED : 22nd JUNE, 2026
                 PER COURT :-


                 1.           The learned Advocate appearing for petitioners, on

                 instructions, seeks permission to withdraw Writ Petitions.



                 2.           Permission granted. Writ Petitions stands dismissed as

                 withdrawn with liberty to avail alternate remedy, if any, as permissible

                 under law.


                                                         ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. )




                 Tandale

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…