Bombay High Court

BHAKTI DOOR PARTS THR ITS PROPRIETOR ANITA SWAPNIL PILAJI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: S G CHAPALGAONKAR

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the writ petitions and dismissed them.

Summary

Petitioners Bhakti Door Parts and its proprietor Anita Swapnil Pilaji filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petitions. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It granted the petitioners' request, allowing the petitions to be withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed, with the Court noting that the petitioners may pursue any alternate remedy permissible by law.

Issues considered

Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw pending writ petitions

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
high court
procedural law
alternate remedy

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24297


                           IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                265 WRIT PETITION NO. 1349 OF 2025
                                              WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1348 OF 2025

                 BHAKTI DOOR PARTS THR ITS PROPRIETOR ANITA SWAPNIL PILAJI
                                      AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT
                                  COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

                                                  ......
                 Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Aniket S. Avhad h/f. Mr. Shrimant
                 Ravsaheb Kedar
                 AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale
                 Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 : Mr. U. L. Momale
                                                  ......

                                              CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                               DATED : 22nd JUNE, 2026
                 PER COURT :-


                 1.           The learned Advocate appearing for petitioners, on

                 instructions, seeks permission to withdraw Writ Petitions.



                 2.           Permission granted. Writ Petitions stands dismissed as

                 withdrawn with liberty to avail alternate remedy, if any, as permissible

                 under law.


                                                         ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. )




                 Tandale

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…