Bombay High Court

ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE HONBLE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PUNE AND ORS

Decided: 8 April 2026
Disposal: Allowed
Bench: MANISH PITALE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Holding

The directions dated 08/04/2026 have been complied with and no further orders are necessary.

Summary

Icici Home Finance Company Ltd. and another secured creditors filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra, the District Magistrate of Pune and others. The petition sought relief and was allowed by the Court in an order dated 08/04/2026. The petitioners later informed the Court that they had complied with the directions of that order, submitting the Tabepavati and panchnama dated 24/04/2026. The Court recorded these documents and marked them for identification. In view of the compliance, the Court held that no further orders were necessary.

Issues considered

Whether the directions issued in the order dated 08/04/2026 have been complied with

Subjects

writ petition
compliance
civil appellate jurisdiction
secured creditor

Judgment

                                                                     20-WP-13728-2025.doc



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                     WRIT PETITION NO. 13728 OF 2025

Icici Home Finance Company Ltd. and            ..             Petitioners
Anr


The State of Maharashtra Thr The ..                          Respondents
Honble District Magistrate, Pune and
Ors
                                  ------------------
Mr. Nikhil Rajani, for the Petitioners.
Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for the Respondent/State.
                                 --------------------
                                 CORAM        :     MANISH PITALE &
                                                    SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
                                   DATE       :     9TH JUNE 2026.
PC:


1.     This petition is listed for compliance in terms of the order dated
08/04/2026, whereby the petition was allowed.

2.     The learned counsel for the petitioner/secured creditor informs this
Court that the directions issued in the order dated 08/04/2026 have been
duly complied with. Copies of the Tabepavati and panchnama, both dated
24/04/2026, have been tendered and the same are taken on record and
marked ‘X’ for identification.

3.     In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this petition.



(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                               (MANISH PITALE, J.)



 Bhalerao                                                                         1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…