Bombay High Court
SHRI. DATTATREY RAMCHANDRA PATILversusTHE DINDORI AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, DINDORI AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Dattatrey Ramchandra Patil filed a writ petition (No. 1400 of 2023) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Dindori Agricultural Produce Market Committee and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 17 February 2026, and no counsel represented him thereafter. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the bench dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
10-WP-1400-2023.DOC
Digitally IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
signed by
SONALI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date: WRIT PETITION NO.1400 OF 2023
2026.03.05
18:14:50
+0530
Dattatrey Ramchandra Patil …Petitioner
Versus
The Dindori Agricultural Produce Market
Committee, Dindori, District-Nashik & Ors. …Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 4th MARCH 2026
PC:
1. None appeared for the Petitioner even on 17th February 2026.
2. None represent the Petitioner even today.
3. The Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.] [BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
Page 1
Sonali
Checking your session…