Bombay High Court

PRALHAD BULAKHI PALVEversusANJANABAI SHANKAR BAVANE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 14351 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the claim of lapse of time rendering the petition ineffective. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The court held that the petition was indeed infructuous and ordered its disposal.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to lapse of time

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
lapse of time
petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:19810




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO.14351 OF 2017


            Pralhad s/o Bulakhi Palve                      ….Petitioner
                     VERSUS
            Anjanabai Shankar Bavane                       …..Respondent
                                             .......
            Mr. P.S. Pawar, Advocate for petitioner
            Mr. S.B. Bhapkar, Advocate for respondent
                                             ....…

                                    CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                    DATE     : 30th APRIL, 2026
            PER COURT :


                        Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by

            passage of time, this petition has become infructuous.        In view

            thereof, the petition stands disposed of as infructuous.



                                           (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)


            fmp/-

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…