Bombay High Court

SHAIKH RAUPHODIN GAYASODINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The writ petitions are withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a review before the respondent.

Summary

Petitioner Shaikh Rauphodin Gayasodin filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel C.V. Thombre, sought permission to withdraw the petitions and to be allowed to file a review before Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh as per the bye‑laws. The bench, comprising Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre, considered the procedural propriety of permitting withdrawal coupled with a liberty to seek review. The court granted the request, allowing the petitions to be withdrawn and directing that a review may be filed later. It also directed that any delay incurred during the prosecution of the petitions be taken into account by the reviewing authority. The writ petitions were consequently disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petitions and be granted liberty to file a review before the respondent.

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
review
procedural law
High Court of Bombay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:3020

                                               1                    WP / 14415 / 2023


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               998 WRIT PETITION NO. 14415 OF 2023

                                SHAIKH RAUPHODIN GAYASODIN
                                          VERSUS
                    STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

                                             WITH
                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 11909 OF 2023

                                     SHAIKH RAUPHODIN GAYASODIN
                                           VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

                                                     ...
                        Advocate for petitioner : Mr. C.V. Thombre (in both WPs)
                          AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. R.B. Dhaware
                                                    ...

                          CORAM               : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.

                          DATE                : 23 JANUARY 2026

              PER COURT :

                          Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
              permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file review as per
              the bye-laws before the respondent no. 2 – Maharashtra Rajya
              Sahakari Sangh.

              2.          Permission is granted.

              3.          Writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to
              the petitioner to file review before the respondent no. 2 - Maharashtra
              Rajya Sahakari Sangh.
                              2                  WP / 14415 / 2023



4.         Delay caused while prosecuting the present petitions shall
be taken into consideration by the authority while considering the
review.



                            [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                      JUDGE

arp/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…