Bombay High Court
SAI MAULI KALA KRIDA SANSKRUTIK MANDALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petition was dismissed as it was not circulated and sought vague relief.
Summary
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in 2016 seeking a blanket order that no action be initiated against him. The petition was never circulated before hearing and the petitioner was absent. The court noted that the prayers were vague and general. Considering the lack of circulation and the indefiniteness of the relief sought, the court dismissed the petition. No merits were examined and the petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition that has not been circulated and contains vague, indefinite prayers can be entertained by the court
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- non-circulation
- vague prayers
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
7-WP-1444-2016 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1444 OF 2016
Shri Sai Mauli Kala, Krida, Sanskrutik Mandal … Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent
——————
None for the Petitioner.
Mrs. Priyanka S. Rane, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI &
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
Date : 18th March 2026.
P. C. :
1. The Petition is of the year 2016. It is not even circulated for once.
2. Today the Petitioner is not present. The vague and general prayers are
made in the Petition i.e. ‘not to initiate any action against him’.
3. Considering the prayers sought in the Petition, and in view of the fact
that the Petition has not been circulated, the Petition stands disposed of as
dismissed.
[ RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J. ] [ MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
OMKAR
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN
osk 1 of 1
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.03.25
15:25:30
+0530
Checking your session…