Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURESH BANSI LABADE AND ANOTHERversusTHE TAHASILDAR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The order is corrected to include the reference to the registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992.

Summary

The petitioners, Suresh Bansi Labade and another, filed a writ petition asserting ownership of a property based on a registered sale deed dated 31.01.1989 and a registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the court's order dated 04.03.2026 omitted reference to the correction deed in Paragraph 3. The bench, after hearing the counsel, agreed that the omission needed rectification. Consequently, Paragraph 3 of the order was corrected to expressly mention the correction deed dated 02.03.1992. The court directed that the corrected copy of the order be uploaded. The motion for correction was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court order should be corrected to include reference to the registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992

Subjects

  • property law
  • sale deed
  • correction deed
  • court order correction
  • writ petition

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:10003
                  This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
                                                                                        M1.odt


                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.14503 OF 2017

                               SURESH BANSI LABADE AND ANOTHER
                                            VERSUS
                                  THE TAHASILDAR AND OTHERS
                                                   ….
                              Mr. A. P. Nahar, Advocate for the petitioners
                                                   ...
                                                  CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                                  DATE           : 11.03.2026

          PER COURT :

          1.      This motion is made for speaking to the minutes in respect of the
          order dated 04.03.2026.


          2.      The learned Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that in
          Paragraph No.3, the word “and Registered Correction Deed dated
          02.03.1992” has not reflected in the order uploaded.


          3.      In view thereof, Paragraph No.3 stands corrected as follows:

               “1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
               petitioners are the lawful owners of the subject property by
               virtue of a registered sale deed dated 31.01.1989 and
               registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992. It is ………….”

          4.      Necessary correction be carried out accordingly and corrected
          copy be uploaded.

          5.      The motion stands disposed of.



                                                               [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]
          Sameer/March-2026                                1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.