Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA SHESHERAO RATHODKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition upon granting of leave.
Summary
The petitioner, Ravindra Shesherao Rathodkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the hearing had commenced, the petitioner, through his counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, upon oral instructions from the petitioner, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition after the hearing has commenced.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- high court
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:3644-DB
911-WP-14559-25.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 14559 OF 2025
Ravindra Shesherao Rathodkar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Another
......
Mr. S.S. Kazi, Advocate for Petitioner
Ms. Neha B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents-State
......
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 28 JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. After hearing the learned advocate for the petitioner for some
time when the disinclination is shown, upon the oral instructions from
the petitioner, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the petition. petition.
2. Leave granted.
3. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
S P Rane
Checking your session…