Bombay High Court

SMT. NILAM SANDEEP CHUDHARY PROP RANGEELA RESTAURANT AND BARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided: 2 July 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off
Bench: SUMAN SHYAM ADVAIT M SETHNA

Holding

The writ petition is disposed as the petitioners have indicated they no longer wish to pursue it.

Summary

The petitioners, Nilam Sandeep Chaudhary and Restaurant & Bar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They later informed the court that their business had been closed for over a year and they no longer wished to pursue the writ. The petitioners, through counsel Ms. Bobby Malhotra, requested that the petition be disposed. The court noted the petitioners' instruction not to prosecute and granted them liberty to seek any other legal remedies if desired. Accordingly, the court disposed of the writ petition.

Subjects

writ petition
disposal
civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                     54-ASWP-14886-2024.DOC




                                                                                     Shephali

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 14886 OF 2024


                      Nilam Sandeep Chaudhary, Prop. Rangeela                 …Petitioners
                      Restaurant & Bar
                            Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                      …Respondents


                      Ms Bobby Malhotra, for the Petitioners.
                      Mr NC Walimbe, Addl. GP, with RA Salunkhe, AGP, for the
                           Respondents.

SHEPHALI
SANJAY
MORMARE                                    CORAM:        SUMAN SHYAM &
Digitally signed by
SHEPHALI
                                                         ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
SANJAY
MORMARE
Date: 2026.07.07
11:08:16 +0530
                                           DATED:        2nd JULY 2026.
                      PC:-


                      1.     Ms Bobby Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the
                      Petitioners submits that the business of her client, i.e., the
                      Petitioner has been closed down more than a year back and,
                      therefore, she has instructions not to prosecute with the Writ
                      Petition. Therefore, granting liberty to the Petitioner to pursue
                      other legal remedies, if so desire, this Writ Petition stand disposed
                      of.




                      (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)                         (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
                                                                                            {




                                                    Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…