Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AADARSH EDUCATION SOCIETY AKOLA ROAD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KAMALKISHOR MOTILAL KABRAversusSHUBHANGI SHRIRAM TAGALPALLEWAR AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

A challenge to the order of condonation of delay does not survive once the tribunal has adjudicated the appeal on its merits.

Summary

The petitioners, Adarsh Education Society, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 10 November 2017 of the Latur School Tribunal that granted condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal, after condoning the delay, proceeded to hear the appeal on its merits and allowed it. The petitioners argued that the order of condonation should be subject to judicial review. The High Court held that once the Tribunal has decided the appeal on its merits, the order of condonation becomes moot and cannot be challenged. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the condonation order was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an order of condonation of delay is maintainable after the tribunal has decided the appeal on its merits

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • condonation of delay
  • school tribunal
  • appeal
  • jurisdiction
  • mootness

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12548
             Dilwale                                       1                   116-WP-15167-17-21.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 116 WRIT PETITION NO. 15167 OF 2017

             Adarsh Education Society Through President Kamalkishor Motilalji Kabra
                                           VERSUS
                          Shubhangi Shriram Tagadpallewar & Another

                                                   ...
             Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Patil Hanmant V. And Amol A. Bhagat
             AGP for Respondents: Mr. R. B. Dhaware
             Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V. S. Panpatte
                                                   ...
                                   CORAM          : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE          : 18.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.        Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.
             2.        In the present petition, the petitioners–management is assailing the
             order 10.11.2017 passed by the learned School Tribunal, Latur whereby
             the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal came to be
             allowed.
             3.        The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, after
             condonation of delay, the learned Tribunal has already adjudicated the
             appeal on merits and the same has been allowed.
             4.        In view of the above, once the Tribunal has already decided the
             appeal on its own merits, the challenge to the order of condonation of
             delay does not survive. Hence, the present writ petition, insofar as it
             challenges the order of condonation of delay, stands disposed of.




                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.