Bombay High Court
SHRIRANG PARDESH S/O YASHWANT TUKARAM PARDESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and took no steps to pursue the petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Shrirang Pardesh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 2 February 2017 and again on 9 March 2026. After the February hearing, the petitioner and his counsel made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and lack of action
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
KSG 26-WP-1544-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1544 OF 2016
Shrirang Pardesh … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 9th MARCH 2026
P.C. :
1) None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
1.1) Record indicates that, even on earlier occasion i.e. on 2 nd
KIRAN
SANJAY February 2017, none had appeared for the Petitioner.
GHUGE
Digitally signed by
KIRAN SANJAY
GHUGE
Date: 2026.03.17
11:05:32 +0530 2) That, after 2nd February 2017, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate
has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…