Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RUPALI BHANUDAS PAWARversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the appearance record may be corrected to accurately reflect the counsel for the parties.

Summary

Petitioners Bharti Kashinath Thopte, Rupali Bhanudas Pawar, Sachin Vitthal Ghodke and Sampat Bhagwan Ekshinge filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. An order dated 12 February 2026 listed the counsel for the respondents incorrectly, conflating the names of Mr. Laxman H. Kawale and Mr. Prashant D. Suryawanshi. The petitioners moved a motion seeking a correction of the appearance record. The Court held that such clerical errors can be rectified to reflect the true counsel appearing before it. Accordingly, the appearance was corrected, the order was to be re‑uploaded, and the motion was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a court may correct a clerical error in the recorded appearance of counsel in a written order

Subjects

  • court procedure
  • correction of record
  • clerical error
  • writ petition
  • appearance correction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:6331
                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of1order
                                                           of 2 dated //    Speaking-WP.1561.2023



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 1561 OF 2023

                                     BHARTI KASHINATH THOPTE
                                              VERSUS
                              THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS
                                                …

                                                  WITH
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 1560 OF 2023

                                      RUPALI BHANUDAS PAWAR
                                              VERSUS
                              THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS
                                                 ...
                                               WITH
                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 5023 OF 2025

                                   SACHIN VITTHAL GHODKE
                                           VERSUS
                    THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
                                              ...
                                            WITH
                                WRIT PETITION NO. 5024 OF 2025

                                   SAMPAT BHAGWAN EKSHINGE
                                              VERSUS
                          THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
                                                 …
               Mr. Dashrath R. Dhumal, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/1560/23 &
               WP/1561/23
               Mr. Sahebrao A. Nagarsoge, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/5024/25
               & 5023/25
               Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for Respondent/State.
               Mr. Laxman H. Kawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in
               WP/1561/23
               Mr. Prashant D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in
               WP/1560/23.
               Mr. Pramod A. Pisal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in WP/1560/23.
                                                 ...

                                               CORAM :         SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
          This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of2order
                                                     of 2 dated //      Speaking-WP.1561.2023



                                         DATE       :    20th FEBRUARY, 2026

          P.C.:-

          1.          Motion is made for speaking to minutes in respect of order

          dated 12.02.2026.


          2.          In the appearance recorded in the order dated 12.02.2026,

          the name “Mr. Laxman H. Kawale h/f. Mr. Prashant D. Suryawanshi,

          Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in WP/1560/23 & WP/1561/23

          is wrongly mentioned, instead of Mr. Laxman H. Kawale, Advocate for

          Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in WP/1561/23 and Mr. Prashant D.

          Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in WP/1560/23.

          3.          In view of the above, the appearance shall stand corrected

          accordingly. Necessary corrections be carried out and the corrected

          order be uploaded.


          4.          The motion is disposed of.

                                                     (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)

Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.