Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. G. P.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of all the writ petitions as withdrawn.

Summary

Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd., through its legal manager, filed multiple writ petitions in the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later sought the court's permission to withdraw all the pending writ petitions. The court considered whether it could entertain the request for withdrawal of the petitions. Upon hearing the petitioners' counsel, the court found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the court ordered that all the writ petitions, along with any pending applications therein, be disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court may permit the withdrawal of multiple pending writ petitions filed by the petitioner.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petitions
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court
  • Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.
  • State of Maharashtra

Judgment

                                                                                    9 & ors_WP_1139_26 & ors.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 1139 OF 2026
                                                          WITH
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 16518 OF 2025
                                                          WITH
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 16523 OF 2025
                                                          WITH
                                         WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 38608 OF 2025
                                                          WITH
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 16408 OF 2025
                                                          WITH
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 16410 OF 2025

                                                                 AND

                                         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                        WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 38401 OF 2025
                                                          WITH
                                        WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 38415 OF 2025

                             Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.,
                             Through Legal Manager Mr. Sameesh Sahadevan …                  Petitioner
                                   vs.
                             The State of Maharashtra                    …                  Respondent

                             Mr. Nikhil Mehta, i/b. KMC Legal Venture for petitioner in all petitions.
                             Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for respondent-State in WP/1139/26.
                             Ms. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for respondent-State in WP/16518/25 and
                             WPSt/38608/25.
                             Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for respondent-State in WP/16523/25.
                             Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for respondent-State in WP/16408/25.
                             Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for respondent-State in WP/16410/25.
                             Ms. Fatima Lakdawalla, AGP for respondent-State in WPL/38401/25.
                             Ms. Madhura Deshmukh, AGP for respondent-State in WPL/38415/25.


                                                               CORAM :       MANISH PITALE &
                                                                             SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ
                                                               DATE      :   28th JANUARY, 2026

          Digitally signed
          by PRIYA
PRIYA KAMBLI
KAMBLI Date:
       2026.01.29
          10:48:13 +0530

                                                                                                            1/2
                                                                   9 & ors_WP_1139_26 & ors.doc



               P.C. :


               .        The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks
               permission to withdraw these writ petitions.


               2.       Hence, the aforesaid writ petitions are disposed of as
               withdrawn. Pending applications therein, if any, are also disposed of.




               (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                         (MANISH PITALE, J.)




Priya Kambli




                                                                                           2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.