Bombay High Court
SURESHKPUMAR TARACHAND GHUSARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- M S KARNIKS M MODAK
Summary
The petitioner, Eshekumar Tarachand Ghusar, a police officer, filed Petition No. 165 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court challenging a suspension order dated 5 March 2024 issued by the Special Inspector General of Police. The petition alleges that the suspension was unauthorized, marked “A” for identification, and related to alleged involvement in Naxal‑related activities. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, were represented by counsel including N.C. Wali and Kavita N. Solunke. The Court examined the procedural validity of the suspension and the authority of the Special Inspector General to impose such a sanction. The judgment excerpt does not disclose the Court’s final reasoning or the ultimate decision on the petition.
Subjects
- suspension
- police
- administrative law
- special inspector general
- Naxal
Judgment
I
NTHEHI
GHCOURTOFJ
UDI
CATUREATBOMBAY
CI
VILAPPELLATEJ
URI
SDI
CTI
ON
WRI
TPETI
TIONNO.
165OF2024
Sur
eshkumarTar
achandGhusar .
.Pe
tit
ione
r
Vs.
TheStat
eofMaharas
htraandOrs. .
.Re
sponde
nts
Mr.Machhi
ndraA.Patil
,wit
hMr .Vij
ayR.Gar
ad,f
orthePeti
ti
oner
.
Mr.N.C.Wali
mbe ,Addl.G.
P.,withMs.Kavi
taN.Solunke
,Asst
.G.P.
,for
t
heRespondent
s-Stat
eofMaharashtr
a.
CORAM : A.
S.CHANDURKAR&
JI
TENDRAJAI
N,JJ
DATE : 5TH APRI
L,2024.
P
.C.:
1. Nonef
ort
hepe
tit
ione
r.
2. Thel
ear
nedAGPhast
ende
redc
opyoft
hec
ommuni
cat
iondat
ed5th
Mar
ch 2024 t
hathasbe
eni
ssue
d byt
heSpe
cialI
nspe
ctorGe
ner
alof
Pol
ice
, Nas
hik Re
gion, Nas
hiki
nthe mat
ter of s
uspe
nsi
on of t
he
pe
tit
ione
r’ss
erv
ice
s.Thes
amei
stake
n on r
ecor
d and mar
ked“
A”f
or
i
dent
if
icat
ion.
3. St
andov
e o3rdMay2024.
rt
[J
ITENDRAJ
AIN,J
.] [A.
S.CHANDURKAR,J
.]
1/1
17-WP-165-2024.doc Digitally
signed by
Dixit SNEHA SNEHA
ABHAY DIXIT
ABHAY Date:
DIXIT 2024.04.08
13:21:42
+0530
Checking your session…