Bombay High Court
SUDARSHAN VISHWAS PATILversusWASIM SAYYED DISTRICT MINING OFFICER AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Sudarshan Vishwas Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Wasim Sayyed and other officials. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous because of the lapse of time. The Court accepted this submission. No substantive merits of the dispute were examined. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition without further hearing. The dismissal was based solely on procedural lapse rather than on the substantive claims.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the lapse of time?
Subjects
- limitation
- writ petition
- procedural dismissal
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
18-WP-16548-2023.DOC
Digitally IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
signed by
SONALI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date: WRIT PETITION NO.16548 OF 2023
2026.03.05
18:14:49
+0530
Sudarshan Vishwas Patil …Petitioner
Versus
Wasim Sayyed,
District Mining Officer and the Member
Secretary, State Level Vigilance Squad, Nashik …Respondents
District & Ors.
Mr. Sandeep Dilip Shinde i/b. Ergo Juris, for the Petitioner.
Mr. M. M. Pable, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 4th MARCH 2026
PC:
1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petition
has been rendered infructuous by the passage of time.
2. Accepting the aforesaid statement, we dispose of the
Petition.
[MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.] [BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
Page 1
Sonali
Checking your session…