Bombay High Court
IIFL HOME FINANCE LTDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
No further orders are necessary as the petitioner has complied with the earlier directions, and the petitions are disposed of.
Summary
IIFL Home Finance Ltd. filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking further directions after earlier orders dated 16 March 2026. The petitioner claimed that it had complied with those orders and had taken physical possession of the secured assets. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by several advocates. The court examined whether any additional orders were required. Finding that the petitioner had indeed complied with the earlier directions, the court held that no further orders were necessary. Consequently, the petitions were disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner has complied with the directions dated 16 March 2026
- Whether any further orders are required in the writ petitions
Subjects
- writ petition
- possession of secured assets
- compliance with court order
- disposal of petition
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
bipin prithiani
1
32-wp-14285.25 & ors.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14285 OF 2025
IIFL Home Finance Ltd. … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1133 OF 2026
BIPIN
Digitally signed by
BIPIN DHARMENDER
WITH
DHARMENDER PRITHIANI
PRITHIANI Date: 2026.04.24
10:28:33 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2026
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 17218 OF 2025
******
Mr. Mangesh M. Deshmukh for the Petitioner in all Petitions.
Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/14285/
2025.
Mrs. T. N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/1133/2026.
Adv. M. M. Pable, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/1134/2026.
Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. G. P., a/w Mrs. G. R. Raghuwanshi,
AGP for Respondent-State in WP/17218/2025.
******
CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : 23rd APRIL 2026
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in these
petitions, the directions contained in orders dated 16 th March
2026 passed in these petitions, have been complied with and that
physical possession of the secured assets has been taken by the
petitioners.
bipin prithiani
2
32-wp-14285.25 & ors.doc
2. In that light, no further orders are necessary in these
petitions and accordingly, the petitions are disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
Checking your session…