Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AMOL SHIVAJI DHASversusTHE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that it can direct the State Information Commission to decide the pending appeal within four weeks based on the respondent's undertaking.

Summary

The petitioner, Amol Shivaji Dhas, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State Information Commission to decide his second appeal dated 10 November 2025 within a stipulated period. The respondent's Additional Government Pleader waived service of notice and, on behalf of the Commission, gave an undertaking to decide the appeal within four weeks. The Court treated this undertaking as a binding commitment. Accordingly, the Court directed the Commission to dispose of the appeal within four weeks from the date of the order. The petition was disposed by granting the relief sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue a direction to an administrative authority to decide a pending appeal within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • second appeal
  • direction
  • administrative law
  • time limit
  • State Information Commission

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12131-DB

                                                                        933-WP-1738-26.odt
                                               {1}

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                               933 WRIT PETITION NO. 1738 OF 2026
                                          Amol Shivaji Dhas
                                              VERSUS
                            The State Information Commission And Others
                                               ......
            Mr. Vishal A. Bagal, Advocate for Petitioners
            Mr. R.S. Wani, AGP for Respondent No.1-State
                                               ......

                                             CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
                                                     HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                             DATE    : 18 MARCH, 2026

            PER COURT :-

            1.         The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to

            respondent No. 1 to decide the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner on

            10.11.2025 within a stipulated period.


            2.         Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents No.1, and
            upon instructions from respondent No.1, makes a statement that the
            said appeal would be decided within a period of four(4) weeks. The
            said statement is taken as undertaking.

            3.         We dispose of the writ petition by directing respondent No.1 to

            decide the said appeal filed by the petitioner dated 10.11.2025 within a

            period of four (4) weeks from today.



            [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                    [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
                         JUDGE                                    JUDGE

            S P Rane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.