Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRADEEP SHRIRANG JAGTAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court directed the Tahsildar to consider the objections within four weeks and disposed of the petition.

Summary

Pradeep Shrirang Jagtap filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner raised specific objections on pages 17, 19 and 23 of a paper‑book. The State, represented by its Additional Government Pleader, opposed the petition. The Court directed the Tahsildar of Bhor to consider the petitioner’s objections and to resolve them within four weeks of the order. The petitioner was instructed to appear before the Tahsildar on 15 January 2026 with a copy of the order. Keeping all contentions open, the Court disposed of the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Tahsildar, Bhor should be directed to consider the objections raised by the petitioner in the paper‑book

Subjects

  • Writ Petition
  • Administrative Law
  • Objections
  • Tahsildar
  • Petition Disposal

Judgment

                             INGLE                                                           10-wp-17569-25.doc

                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally signed
URMILA by URMILA
       PRAMOD                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PRAMOD INGALE
       Date:
INGALE 2026.01.09
          13:10:48 +0530

                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 17569 OF 2025

                             Pradeep Shrirang Jagtap                               …     Petitioner
                                   V/s.
                             The State of Maharashtra and anr.                     …     Respondents


                             Mr. Parag Tilak, for the Petitioner (Through V.C.).
                             Smt. P.J. Gavhane, AGP for the Respondent-State.

                                                                   CORAM :         M.S. KARNIK AND
                                                                                   S.M.MODAK, JJ.

                                                                   DATE      :     8th JANUARY 2026
                             P.C.:-

                             1.        We have heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned

                             AGP.

                             2.        Learned AGP opposes the Petition. This Petition can be disposed

                             of by directing Tahsildar, Bhor to consider the objections raised by the

                             Petitioner which are at page nos. 17, 19 and 23 of the paper-book and take

                             the same to its logical end within a period of 4 weeks from the date of

                             communication of this order.

                             3.        Learned counsel for the Petitioner assures that the Petitioner will

                             present himself before Tahsildar, Bhor along with copy of this order on

                             15/01/2026 at 11:00 a.m.

                             4.        Keeping all contentions open, the Petition is disposed of.



                             (S.M.MODAK, J.)                                           (M.S. KARNIK, J.)

                                                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.