Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KINJAL API SHETH JV A JOINT VENTUREversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

A typographical mistake in the recorded date of a court order may be corrected by issuing a fresh order.

Summary

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.1759 of 2025 before the High Court of Bombay. The Registry noted that the order dated 16 February 2026 contained a typographical error, as the hearing was listed for 17 February 2026. The issue before the Court was whether the clerical mistake in the recorded date could be rectified. The Court reasoned that such a mistake does not affect the substantive rights of the parties and may be corrected by issuing a fresh order. Consequently, the Court ordered that the date be corrected to 17 February 2026 and a fresh order be uploaded.

Issues considered

  • Whether a typographical mistake in the date of a court order can be corrected by the Court

Subjects

  • clerical error
  • date correction
  • civil procedure
  • writ petition
  • high court

Judgment

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.1759 OF 2025
                      Kinjal API Sheth (JV),                             ]
                      Dadar (West), Mumbai – 400 028.                    ]..Petitioner
                                   Versus
                      1. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai,        ]
                         Through MCGM’s Legal Department,                ]
                         Fort, Mumbai – 400 001.                         ]
                      2. Office of the Deputy Chief Engineer,            ]
                         BC City, MCGM,                                  ]
                         Through MCGM’s Legal Department,                ]
                         Fort, Mumbai – 400 001.                         ]..Respondents

                      Mr. Aalam Parsurampuria with Mr. Sangram Parab,                    i/by
                      Mr. Prashant Parsurampuria, Advocates for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Akshay Shinde with Ms. K.H. Mastakar, Advocates for the
                      Respondents.

                                              CORAM :    SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ. &
                                                         GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
                                              DATE   :   25TH FEBRUARY 2026.

                      P.C. :

                              The Registry has pointed out that Writ Petition no.1759 of
                      2025 was listed on 17th February 2026. Whereas, on account of a
                      typographical mistake the date of the order has been recorded as
                      “16th February 2026”. This mistake be corrected and a fresh order
                      dated 17th February 2026 in Writ Petition no.1759 of 2025 be
                      uploaded.



                       [ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ]                       [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]
  SNEHA
  ABHAY
  DIXIT
Digitally signed by
SNEHA ABHAY
DIXIT
Date: 2026.02.25
21:10:58 +0530




                                                           1/1
                      901-WP-1759-2025.doc                                               Dixit


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.