Bombay High Court
GUNAJI JANU DHAWADEversusGRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court remanded the matter to the Additional Collector to establish the petitioner’s identity and grant statutory benefits despite name variations.
Summary
The petitioner, Gunaji Janu Dhawade, challenged a July 26, 2024 order that rejected his appeal against a November 13, 2021 order denying him statutory benefits because of inconsistencies in how his name appeared in various documents. He argued that the variations—such as Gunaji Janu Dhawade, Janu Gunaji Dhawade, and Dhawade Gunaji Janu—should not prevent him from receiving benefits. The court noted that the petitioner had not been given notice of the proceedings before the Additional Collector, violating procedural fairness. It held that the matter should be remanded to the Additional Collector to re‑examine the records, confirm the petitioner’s identity, and ensure he is not denied benefits due to name discrepancies. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of with directions to the Additional Collector to fix a hearing date and resolve the identity issue.
Issues considered
- Whether variations in the spelling and order of the petitioner’s name in official documents justify denial of statutory benefits
- Whether the petitioner was denied procedural fairness by not being given notice of the proceedings before the Additional Collector
Subjects
- name discrepancy
- statutory benefits
- identity verification
- procedural fairness
- remand
- administrative law
Judgment
37-WP-17700-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 17700 OF 2024
Gunaji Janu Dhawade …Petitioner
Versus
Grievance Redressal Committee And Ors …Respondents
Mr. P.G. Parkar, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Nishigandh N. Patil, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Ms. Sulbha Chipade, AGP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.
DATE : March 4, 2026
ORDER :
1. This Petition impugns an order dated July 26, 2024, by which
an Appeal against the order dated November 13, 2021, was rejected. The
Petitioner’s prime grievance is that the stipulated documents which
evidence his residence in the subject slum unit, along with his photo
pass, record his name as Janu Gunaji Dhawade, whereas in the receipt
of the cooperative housing society, his name is shown as Gunaji Janu
Dhawade.
2. Documents forming part of the record indicate, for example,
ASHWINI that the electricity bill and the ration card all contained his name in
JANARDAN
VALLAKATI
Digitally signed by
ASHWINI JANARDAN
VALLAKATI
Date: 2026.03.10
11:47:15 +0530
Page 1 of 3
March 4, 2026
Ashwini Vallakati
37-WP-17700-2024.doc
varying combinations; in the ration card, his name is shown as Dhawade
Gunaji Janu, whereas in the electricity bill his name is shown as Gunaji
Janu Dhawade, as is the case with the receipt issued by the cooperative
society.
3. In these circumstances, having heard the parties, it would be
appropriate to remand the matter to the Additional Collector, i.e.
Respondent No.2, to establish the identity of the Petitioner and ensure
that he is not denied the statutory benefits due to him merely in view of
the combination in which his name is contained in the records. It is also
stated by the Petitioner that, throughout the proceedings before the
Additional Collector, he had no notice of the conduct of the proceedings,
which stance is consistent with the order dated November 13, 2021
which indicates that the parties were absent throughout the proceedings
before the Learned Additional Collector.
4. Therefore, the matter is remanded to the Learned Additional
Collector, requesting him to examine the matter afresh and consider the
records produced by the Petitioner, establish his identity and grant him
his statutory benefits once the variation in name combinations are
reconciled.
Page 2 of 3
March 4, 2026
Ashwini Vallakati
37-WP-17700-2024.doc
5. With the aforesaid directions, the Petition is disposed of,
remanding the matter to Respondent No.2, and requesting Respondent
No. 2 to examine all available records and fix a date for hearing the
Petitioner, to enable him to identify himself and establish that the
variation in combination of how his name is spelled does not lead to an
avoidable denial of his statutory rights.
6. This Petition is finally disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
7. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall
be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s
website.
[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
Page 3 of 3
March 4, 2026
Ashwini Vallakati
Checking your session…