Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AYASHABI JABBIR MOMINversusSAU LILA GULAB RODE

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court allowed the correction of the appearance clause and the erroneous date, directing issuance of a corrected order.

Summary

The petitioner filed a praecipe seeking correction of clerical errors in the order dated 08.01.2026. The Court examined the appearance clause and identified that it should read “Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam, Advocate i/by Uday B. Nighot and Ms. Akanksha Gond for Petitioner.” It also noted that the date mentioned as “15.10.2023” in paragraphs 16 and 18 should be corrected to “15.10.2025.” The Court directed that these corrections be made in the original order and that a fresh copy be uploaded. The praecipe was then disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may correct clerical errors in its own order without a fresh hearing

Subjects

  • clerical correction
  • praecipe
  • civil procedure
  • order correction

Judgment

                                                                        P10.WP.17770.2025.doc

HARSHADA H. SAWANT
      (P.A.)
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                               WRIT PETITION NO.17770 OF 2025

              Ayashabi Jabbir Momin                            .. Petitioner
                         Versus
              Sau Lila Gulab Rode and Ors.                     .. Respondents
                                          ....................
               Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam, Advocate i/by Mr. Uday B. Nighot and Ms.
                 Akanksha Gond for Petitioner.
               Ms. Savita Prabhune, Advocate for Respondent – State.
                                               ...................

                                              CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                              DATE          : JANUARY 12, 2026
              P.C.:

              1.        Not on Board. Mentioned by way of filing praecipe dated

              12.01.2026. Perused the praecipe filed for Speaking to the Minutes of

              order dated 08.01.2026.


              2.        Heard Mr. Kadam, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Ms.

              Prabhune, learned Advocate for Respondent – State.


              3.        The appearance clause of order dated 08.01.2026 be read as

              ‘Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam, Advocate i/by Uday B. Nighot and Ms.

              Akanksha Gond for Petitioner.’


              4.        In the ninth line of paragraph No.16 and second line of

              paragraph No.18 of the order dated 08.01.2026, the date ‘15.10.2023’

              be read as ‘15.10.2025’.


              5.        Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order and


                                                                                       1 of 2
                                                                     P10.WP.17770.2025.doc


                fresh copy be uploaded.


                6.               Praecipe is disposed.


H. H. SAWANT                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]




                          Digitally signed
               HARSHADA   by HARSHADA
                          HANUMANT
               HANUMANT   SAWANT
               SAWANT     Date: 2026.01.13
                          10:36:16 +0530




                                                                                    2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.