Bombay High Court
RAFIQ YUSUF SAYYEDversusBHIMSINGH GULABSINGH THAKUR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Rafiq Yusuf Sayyed, filed a writ petition (No. 1871 of 2019) against Bhimsingh Gulabsingh Thakur in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for several years. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. The Court considered whether the delay rendered the petition ineffective. Relying on the principle that a petition may be dismissed if it becomes moot because of elapsed time, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is barred or rendered infructuous by the lapse of time?
Subjects
- writ petition
- lapse of time
- infructuous
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:21490
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 WRIT PETITION NO. 1871 OF 2019
Rafiq Yusuf Sayyed ….Petitioner
VERSUS
Bhimsingh Gulabsingh Thakur …..Respondent
.......
Mr. S.S. Kazi, Advocate for petitioner
....…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 8th MAY, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
submits that, by passage of time, the present petition is rendered
infructuous. In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…