Bombay High Court
VAIBHAV SHIVRAM PATANKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Vaibhav Shivram Patankar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after May 2, 2017, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The respondents, represented by Ms. M.H. Mhatre, argued that the petition was abandoned. The Court examined whether the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Finding that the petitioner had not acted to advance the petition, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue the petition.
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
KSG 30-WP-1910-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1910 OF 2016
Vaibhav Shivram Patankar … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 9th MARCH 2026
P.C. :
1) None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 2nd May 2017, Petitioner and/or his
KIRAN
SANJAY Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
GHUGE
Digitally signed by
KIRAN SANJAY
GHUGE
Date: 2026.03.17
11:05:34 +0530 2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…