Bombay High Court
SUNIL BAJIRAO PINGALE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
- Bench
- MILIND N JADHAV
Holding
The Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Summary
Sunil Bajirao Pingale and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through Advocate Vedant P. Babar, sought to withdraw the petition because the correct annexures and exhibits had not been appended. The respondents, represented by B‑Panel Counsel Ketan Joshi, opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioners' request and, after hearing both sides, granted leave and liberty to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
39.WP.1917.2026.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1917 OF 2026
Sunil Bajirao Pingale and Anr. .. Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents
....................
Mr. Vedant P. Babar, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. Ketan Joshi, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for Respondent – State.
......…...........
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Babar, learned Advocate for Petitioners and Mr.
Joshi, learned ‘B’ Panel Counsel for Respondent – State.
2. Mr. Babar, learned Advocate appearing for Petitioners would
submit that he has instructions to withdraw the present Writ Petition
with leave and liberty to file fresh Petition in view of the correct
Annexures and Exhibits not having been appended thereto.
3. Leave and liberty is granted as prayed for.
4. Writ Petition is disposed as withdrawn.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally signed
by AJAY
TRAMBAK
AJAY UGALMUGALE
TRAMBAK
UGALMUGALE Date:
2026.02.17
17:48:45
+0530
1 of 1
Checking your session…