Bombay High Court
DR. SUMEDH VINAYAK ANATHPINDIKAversusTHE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PRIMARY EDUCTION , PUNE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The writ petition filed by Dr. Sumedh Vinayak Anathpindika in 2019 remained unattended for several years. The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court on multiple listed dates, including 8 October 2024, 10 September 2025, and again on the hearing date of 13 January 2026. The Court noted the petitioner’s apparent lack of interest in prosecuting the petition. Despite granting an additional adjournment, the petitioner still did not appear. Consequently, the Court exercised its inherent power to dismiss the petition for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered jointly by Justices Sandesh D. Patil and Sarang V. Kotwal.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when a petitioner repeatedly fails to appear and prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- adjournment
Judgment
19-WP-1953-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1953 OF 2019
Dr. Sumedh Vinayak
Anathpindika … Petitioner
Versus
SHARADA
The Director, Directorate Of
RANGNATH
WAHULE Primary Eduction, Pune And
Digitally signed by
SHARADA
RANGNATH
Ors … Respondents
WAHULE
Date: 2026.01.14
15:17:59 +0530
****
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 5.
****
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026
P.C. :
1. Since long nobody is appearing for the Petitioner. The
Petition is pending since 2016. The order dated 8 th October, 2024
records that nobody had appeared for the Petitioner. It was also
observed that the Court would be inclined to pass the order of
dismissal. Even thereafter when the matter was listed on 10 th
September, 2025 nobody had appeared for the Petitioner. Only to
SUB 1
19-WP-1953-2019.odt
give one more opportunity the matter was adjourned. Even today
nobody appears for the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner is
not interested in the prosecuting this Petition. Therefore, the
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
SUB 2
Checking your session…