Bombay High Court
ATUL RAJENDRA DEORE AND OTHERSversusARBITRATOR DISTRICT COLLECTOR DHULE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach an alternate remedy if any.
Summary
Atul Rajendra Deore and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Arbitrator and the District Collector of Dhule. The petitioners, through Advocate V. B. Patil, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition, citing the availability of an alternate remedy. The Court considered the request and granted liberty to the petitioners to pursue any other legal remedy that may exist. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order emphasizes that withdrawal does not preclude the petitioners from seeking relief through other appropriate legal avenues.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to pursue an alternate remedy?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- alternate remedy
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:19650
(1) wp-1976-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1976 OF 2026
ATUL RAJENDRA DEORE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
ARBITRATOR DISTRICT COLLECTOR DHULE AND OTHERS
...
Mr. V. B. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner.
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 30th APRIL, 2026.
P.C.:-
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2. The learned Advocate appearing for applicants on
instructions seeks permission to withdraw Writ Petition with
liberty to avail alternate remedy as permissible under law.
3. Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to
take up alternate remedy, if any, under law.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)
JUDGE
Devendra/April-2026
Checking your session…